Preview

Kavkazologiya

Advanced search

Discussion in the British government on the issue of intervention in Transcaucasia in December 1918 – march 1919

https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2025-4-124-136

EDN: ERRXOF

Abstract

The article is devoted to the events in Transcaucasia after the defeat of Germany and the Ottoman Empire in the First World War. The discussion in the Military Council and the Imperial Military Council on the development of British policy in Transcaucasia in December 1918 – March 1919 is shown. At the end of 1917, Great Britain and France divided their spheres of influence on the territory of the former Russian Empire, and Transcaucasia began to enter the sphere of Britain's geopolitical interests. The situation in Transcaucasia was complicated by the outbreak of Civil War in the territory of the former Russian Empire and the need for the former Entente allies to determine their attitude towards supporting Russian anti-Bolshevik forces. The main disputes in the British government over military involvement in the anti-Bolshevik struggle in Russia unfolded between Prime Minister D. Lloyd George, who envisioned a joint solution to this problem at peace conferences, and Secretary of State for Military Affairs appointed by him in January 1919. Churchill, who defended the position of immediate assistance to the White Movement. Against the background of complex internal relations between various political forces in Transcaucasia and the presence of problems in Great Britain itself, the Entente's policy in Transcaucasia was indecisive, contradictory and inconsistent, which resulted in the decision to withdraw British troops from the region in March 1919.. Soviet Russia benefited from this, having managed to defeat its opponents on all fronts and restore the borders of the former Russian Empire in Transcaucasia 

About the Author

Mikhail A. Maksimov
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer at the Department of English No. 6



References

1. ABDULLAEV YA.S.O., LOBANOV V.B., MIKHAILOV V.V. Azerbajdzhanskaya demokraticheskaya respublika v bor'be za sohranenie territorial'noj celostnosti v 1918-1920 gg. [The Azerbaijan Democratic Republic in the struggle for the preservation of territorial integrity in 1918-1920]. IN: Modern scientific thought. – 2018. – No. 6. – Pp. 81-88. (In Russ.).

2. BEZUGOL'NYJ A.Yu. General Bicherahov i ego Kavkazskaya armiya. Neizvestnye stranicy istorii Grazhdanskoj vojny i intervencii na Kavkaze. 1917–1919. [General Bicherakhov and his Caucasian Army. Unknown Pages of the History of the Civil War and Intervention in the Caucasus. 1917–1919]. – M.: Centrpoligraf, 2011. – 348 p. (In Russ.).

3. DENIKIN A.I. Ocherki russkoj smuty. [Essays on the Russian Troubles ]. Vol. 4. – Berlin: Slovo, 1925. – 244 p. (In Russ.).

4. KELLY S. «Britannia has ruled here»: Transcaucasia and Considerations of Imperial Defense in Lord Curzon’s Search for a Near Eastern Settlement, 1918-1923. Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfillment… Degree of Masters of Arts in the Department of History. Simon Frazer Univ, October, 2003. (In English). (In English).

5. KENNEDY Р. The Realities Behind Diplomacy: Background Influences on British External Policy, 1865-1980. – London-Glasgow: Allen and Unwin & Fontana Books, 1981. – 416 р. (In English).

6. KOPISTO L. The British Intervention in South Russia 1918-1920. Academic Dissertation Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki, April, 2011. (In English).

7. KRASNOV P. N. Vsevelikoe Vojsko Donskoe [The All-Great Don Cossack Army]. IN: Arhiv russkoj revolyucii [Archive of the Russian Revolution ]. Vol. 5. – Berlin: G.V. Gessen Publ., 1922. – 372 p. (In Russ.).

8. LOBANOV V.B. Terskoj oblasti k Gorskoj ASSR: Terek v 1917-1921 gg. [From the Tersk region to the Gorsky ASSR: The Terek in 1917-1921]. IN: Electronic journal "Kavkazologiya". - 2022. – No. 1. – pp. 48-60. (In Russ.).

9. LOBANOV V.B. Poslednee delo generala M.V. Alekseeva [The last case of General M.V. Alekseev]. IN: Russian history. 2022. No. 3. pp. 230-233. (In Russ.).

10. LOBANOV V.B., MIKHAILOV V.V. Belogvardejskaya flotiliya na Kaspii v 1919-1920 gg. [The White Guard flotilla in the Caspian Sea in 1919-1920]. IN: Military Historical Journal. 2019. No. 9. pp. 38-42. (In Russ.).

11. LLOJD-GEORGE D. Pravda o dogovorah [The Truth about Treaties ]. Vol. 1. – M.: Izd-vo instr.lit-ry, 1957. – 656 p. (In Russ.).

12. MIKOYAN A.I. Dorogoj bor'by [The Road of Struggle]. – M.: Politicheskaya literatura, 1971. – 590 p. (In Russ.).

13. MIHAJLOV V. 1918 god v Azerbajdzhane: iz predystorii britanskoj okkupacii Baku [1918 in Azerbaijan: From the Prehistory of the British Occupation of Baku]. IN: Klio. – 2011. – № 1 (52). – P. 26-30. (In Russ.).

14. MIHAJLOV V. Gallipoli 1915: mogila russkoj mechty i britanskih soldat [Gallipoli 1915: The Grave of the Russian Dream and the British Soldiers ]. – SPb.: «Nestor», 2010. – 268 p. (In Russ.).

15. MIHAJLOV V. Porazhenie Turcii v Pervoj mirovoj vojne i sud'ba pervoj nezavisimoj Demokraticheskoj Azerbajdzhanskoj Respubliki [The Defeat of Turkey in the First World War and the Fate of the First Independent Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan ]. IN: Klio. – 2008. – № 3 (42). – P. 17-19. (In Russ.).

16. MIHAJLOV V. Rossijskie i britanskie vooruzhennye soedineniya v srazheniyah protiv turok pri oborone Baku v 1918 g. [Russian and British Armed Forces in the Battles Against the Turks during the Defense of Baku in 1918]. IN: Klio. – 2006. – № 1 (32). – P. 196-207. (In Russ.).

17. MIHAJLOV V. Russkaya revolyuciya i peregovory anglijskogo prem'er-ministra Devida Llojd Dzhordzha o separatnom mire s Osmanskoj imperiej v 1917 – 1918 gg. (po materialam anglijskih arhivov) [The Russian Revolution and the Negotiations of British Prime Minister David Lloyd George on a Separate Peace with the Ottoman Empire in 1917-1918 (Based on Materials from British Archives)]. IN: Klio. – 2017. – № 4 (124). – P. 166-173. (In Russ.).

18. MOROZOVA O. M. Britanskoe prisutstvie na Kavkaze v 1918-1919 gg. IN: Britancy i narody Yuga Rossii: problemy vzaimovliyaniya [The British Presence in the Caucasus in 1918-1919 // The British and the Peoples of Southern Russia: Problems of Mutual Influence ]. – Krasnodar: OOO «Ekoinvest», 2015. – P. 111-120. (In Russ.).

19. MUSTAFA-ZADE R. Dve respubliki. Azerbajdzhano-rossijskie otnosheniya v 1918-1922 gg.[ Mustafa-zade R. Two Republics. Azerbaijani-Russian Relations in 1918-1922]. – M.: MIK, 2006. – 355 p. (In Russ.).

20. NICOLSON H. Curzon, The Last Phase, 1919-1925. A Study of Post-War Diplomacy. – London: Constable, 1934. – 416 р. (In English).

21. OVCHINNIKOV V.V. Prichastnost' k teme [Involvement in the Topic]. IN: Rotshtejn E. Kogda Angliya vtorglas' v Sovetskuyu Rossiyu… [When England Invaded Soviet Russia…]. – M.: Progress, 1982. – 192 p. (In Russ.).

22. SARGENT M. British Military Involvement in Transcaspia (1918-1919). IN: Conflict Studies Research Centre, Caucasus Series. – April, 2004. – 54 р. (In English).

23.


Review

For citations:


Maksimov M.A. Discussion in the British government on the issue of intervention in Transcaucasia in December 1918 – march 1919. Kavkazologiya. 2025;(4):124-136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31143/2542-212X-2025-4-124-136. EDN: ERRXOF

Views: 4


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2542-212X (Online)